Participant Profile in Qualitative Research: Selection Criteria, Saturation, and Validation

Kabwe Lusombo Omari; Julia Silvestre Henriques; Chibalonza Mpenda

doi:10.67294/h7havr06

Authors

Kabwe Lusombo Omari Universidade Internacional Iberoamericana-UNINI Author
Julia Silvestre Henriques Universidade Rovuma, Moçambique Author
Chibalonza Mpenda Universidade Internacional Iberoamericana-UNINI Author https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3571-6186

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67294/h7havr06

Keywords:

Participant Profile, Sociodemographic Characterization, Sampling, Research Validity, Scientific Methodology

Abstract

This article analyzes the theoretical-methodological foundations underlying participant characterization in scientific studies. The specific objectives are to: (a) identify key sociodemographic variables used in characterization; (b) describe the importance of the sample profile for interpreting results; (c) analyze advantages, limitations, and classifications of sampling strategies; and (d) discuss implications for internal and external validity. The guiding question is: how does rigorous participant characterization contribute to the quality and credibility of scientific research? Methodologically, this is a narrative theoretical review of authors published mainly between 2021 and 2025, using a documentary analysis matrix (registration protocol) to record authorship, methodological approach, and thematic contribution for each source. Findings show that detailed sample-profile description is indispensable for data interpretation and generalization — a position this article endorses, arguing that characterization should be treated as an analytical instrument rather than a mere formality.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oab

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.

Bryman, A. (2021). Social research methods (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2021). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Flick, U. (2021). Introducing research methodology: Thinking your way through your research project (3th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fontanella, B. J. B., & Melo, D. G. (2023). Participant characterization in qualitative health research: Beyond the sociodemographic profile. Qualitative Health Research, 33(4), 312-325. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323231157842

Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408-1416.

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2022). Multivariate data analysis (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753-1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444

Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522-525. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522

Minayo, M. C. S. (2021). O desafio do conhecimento: Pesquisa qualitativa em saúde (15th ed.). Hucitec.

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. T. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 281-316.

O'Reilly, M., & Parker, N. (2013). 'Unsatisfactory saturation': A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 13(2), 190-197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112446106

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2014). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543

Sampieri, R. H., Collado, C. F., & Baptista Lucio, M. P. (2022). Metodología de la investigación (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18(2), 179-183. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180211

Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893-1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8

Stake, R. E. (2021). Qualitative research: Studying how things work (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837-851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1). United Nations General Assembly.

Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: Systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7

Yin, R. K. (2023). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.