Designing Explainable AI-Powered Adaptive UX Interfaces to Reduce Technostress and Improve Digital Wellbeing among Generation X Knowledge Workers

José De la Torre; Alberto Ochoa

doi:10.67294/h4hm2621

Authors

José de la Torre Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero Author https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8845-7289
Dr. Alberto Ochoa Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67294/h4hm2621

Keywords:

Explainable Artificial Intelligence, Adaptive UX, Generation X, Human-Centered AI, Industry 5.0

Abstract

This research adopts a human-centered perspective in which artificial intelligence is conceptualized not as a replacement for human cognition, but as an adaptive partner that supports decision-making while minimizing unnecessary cognitive burden. Generation X knowledge workers, typically defined as individuals born between 1965 and 1980, represent a critical yet underexplored demographic in Human–Computer Interaction and artificial intelligence research. Although this cohort occupies a large share of managerial and decision-making roles, they increasingly interact with AI-driven environments not designed with their cognitive or ergonomic profiles in mind, contributing to elevated technostress, cognitive overload, and perceived loss of control. This paper proposes a Human-Centered AI framework that integrates Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) and Adaptive User Experience (AUX) design to mitigate technostress and improve digital wellbeing. The system combines machine learning-based cognitive state inference with real-time interface adaptation and multi-layered explanation mechanisms, including SHAP, LIME, counterfactual reasoning, and natural language generation. A mixed -methods design was adopted, combining structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with a controlled within-subject experiment, complemented by a pilot validation with 28 Generation X participants assessing feasibility, usability, cognitive load reduction, and perceived transparency. Despite rapid advances in AI, little attention has been devoted to designing systems that actively support users' cognitive and psychological wellbeing rather than simply optimizing efficiency. This study shifts the focus from technology-centered innovation toward human-centered AI, proposing that intelligent interfaces should function not only as decision-support tools but also as mechanisms for reducing technostress, preserving human cognitive resources, and promoting sustainable digital work environments.

References

Aravindkumar, A., Ramadoss, M., Fakhruddin Ahmed, SA, Sampath, V., & Lakshminarayanan, K. (2026). Explainable AI in healthcare: A systematic review of XAI use cases in imaging, diagnostics, and rehabilitation. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 9, 1749527. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.1749527 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.1749527

Bondanini, G., Giorgi, G., Ariza-Montes, A., Vega-Muñoz, A., & Andreucci-Annunziata, P. (2020). Technostress Dark Side of Technology in the Workplace: A Scientometric Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8013. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218013

Borle, P., Reichel, K., Niebuhr, F., & Voelter-Mahlknecht, S. (2021). How Are Techno-Stressors Associated with Mental Health and Work Outcomes? A Systematic Review of Occupational Exposure to Information and Communication Technologies within the Technostress Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8673. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168673 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168673

Brivio, E., Gaudioso, F., Vergine, I., Mirizzi, C. R., Reina, C., Stellari, A., & Galimberti, C. (2018). Preventing Technostress Through Positive Technology. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2569. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02569

Chirayath, G., Premamalini, K., & Joseph, J. (2025). Cognitive Offloading or Cognitive Overload? How AI Alters the Mental Architecture of Coping. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1699320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1699320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1699320

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. Advances in Psychology, 52, 139-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9

Hertzum, M. (2021). Reference values and subscale patterns for the Task Load Index (TLX): A meta-analytic view. Ergonomics, 64(7), 869–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2021.1876927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2021.1876927

Högemann, M., Hein, L., Britsche, J.-O., & Thomas, O. (2025). Technostress and Generative AI in the Workplace: A Qualitative Analysis of Young Professionals. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1728881. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1728881 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1728881

Jahn, T., Hühn, P., & Reichert, M. (2026). A Review on Empirical Studies in Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence Review, 59, Article 11595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-026-11595-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-026-11595-6

Jin, T., Yang, X., & Zhang, L. (2026). Understanding AI Technostress and Employee Career Growth from a Socio-Technical Systems Perspective: A Dual-Path Model. Systems, 14(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14010058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14010058

Mansuroğlu, E., & Smith, A. P. (2026). Technostress and employee well-being: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 21, 100941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2026.100941 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2026.100941

Mohseni, S., Zarei, N., & Ragan, E. D. (2021). A Multidisciplinary Survey and Framework for Design and Evaluation of Explainable AI Systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 11(3–4), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3387166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3387166

Mondo, M., Pileri, J., Barbieri, B., Bellini, D., & De Simone, S. (2023). The role of techno-stress and psychological detachment in the relationship between workload and well-being in a sample of Italian smart workers: A moderated mediated model. Social Sciences, 12(10, 530. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12100530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12100530

Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). “Why Should I Trust You?” Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1135–1144. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778

Savolainen, I., Ylinen, L., Grönroos, R., & Oksanen, A. (2026). AI Transformation in Working Life: A Systematic Review of Usage and Attitudes Towards AI Among Workers. Digital Business, 6(1), Article 100162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2025.100162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2025.100162

Shin, D. (2021). The Effects of Explainability and Causability on Perception, Trust, and Acceptance: Implications for Explainable AI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 146, 102551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102551 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102551

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Tarafdar, M., Pullins, E. B., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2015). Technostress: Negative Effect on Performance and Possible Mitigations. Information Systems Journal, 25(2), 103–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12042

Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The Impact of Technostress on Role Stress and Productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109

Vidanaralage, A. J., Dharmaratne, A. T., & Haque, S. T. (2022). AI-Based Multidisciplinary Framework to Assess the Impact of Gamified Video-Based Learning Through Schema and Emotion Analysis. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100109

Wang, W., Gao, S., Chen, Q., & Ma, S. (2025). The Influence of Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Mental Health Literacy on Professional Psychological Help-Seeking Behavior: The Mediating Role of Psychological Problem Cognition. Behavioral Sciences, 15(12), 1646. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15121646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15121646

Zhang, K., Wang, D., Lin, F., Xie, J., & Zhou, W. (2026). A Comprehensive Review of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Methods, Evaluation, and Clinical Integration. iScience, 29(3), 115026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.115026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.115026