Augmented Reality and Situated Learning in Basic Education: Evaluation of an Immersive Experience on a Recreational Trail
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67294/5x8m0h45Keywords:
Augmented Reality, Situated Learning, Basic Education, Educational Evaluation, Science OutreachAbstract
This study evaluated the educational impact of an augmented reality (AR) experience implemented on a recreational and interpretive trail designed to foster university engagement on the La Paz campus of the Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur (UABCS), targeted at basic-education children. Although the recreational trail received 500 school visits during its operation, most initiatives of this kind lack empirical evaluation of their impact. The study used a mixed, descriptive, pre-experimental design, with a pre-test and post-test administered to a convenience subsample of 30 participants (M age = 7.47 years), complemented by a retrospective documentary and photographic analysis of the visits. The results showed a statistically significant, large-magnitude learning improvement between the pre-test and post-test (from 7.13 to 9.93 out of 10; Wilcoxon test, r = 0.70), as well as high levels of motivation (M = 4.60/5), satisfaction (M = 4.54/5), and immersion (M = 4.40/5). The usability of the technology scored the lowest among the four evaluated indices (M = 4.19/5), particularly among the youngest participants, suggesting that the main barrier to the experience was technological rather than cognitive. A negative correlation was also found between motivation and learning gains, which should be interpreted with caution due to the ceiling effect observed in the post-test, as well as strong positive correlations between immersion-motivation and usability-satisfaction. These findings provide novel empirical evidence regarding the pedagogical value of AR in university science outreach contexts outside the traditional classroom and offer an empirical basis for improving and scaling up this type of intervention.
References
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
Blázquez Sevilla, A. (2017). Realidad aumentada en educación. Gabinete de Tele-Educación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. https://oa.upm.es/45985/
Cabero-Almenara, J., Barroso-Osuna, J., Llorente-Cejudo, C., & Fernández Martínez, M. D. M. (2019). Educational uses of augmented reality (AR): Experiences in educational science. Sustainability, 11(18), 4990. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184990
Chen, C., & Wang, C.-H. (2015). Employing augmented-reality-embedded instruction to disperse the imparities of individual differences in earth science learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 835-847. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/175253/
de Pedro Carracedo, J., & Martínez Méndez, C. L. (2012). Realidad aumentada: Una alternativa metodológica en la educación primaria nicaragüense. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje: IEEE-RITA, 7(2), 102-108. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7140294
Elmqaddem, N. (2019). Augmented reality and virtual reality in education. Myth or reality? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(3), 234-242. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i03.9289
Freitas, R., & Campos, P. (2008). SMART: A System of Augmented Reality for Teaching 2nd Grade Students. Proceedings of the 22nd British Computer Society Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI 2008). https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2008.26
Garzón, J., & Acevedo, J. (2019). Meta-analysis of the impact of Augmented Reality on students' learning gains. Educational Research Review, 27, 244-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.04.001
Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 447-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00379-9
Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583-621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Liarokapis, F., Mourkoussis, N., White, M., Darcy, J., Sifniotis, M., Petridis, P., & Lister, P. (2004). Web3D and augmented reality to support engineering education. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 3(1), 11-14. http://www.wiete.com.au/journals/WTE&TE/Pages/Vol.3,%20No.1%20(2004)/03_Liarokapis29.pdf
Maas, M. J., & Hughes, J. M. (2020). Virtual, augmented and mixed reality in K-12 education: A review of the literature. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(2), 231-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1737210
Marín-Díaz, V., & Sampedro-Requena, B. E. (2020). La Realidad Aumentada en Educación Primaria desde la visión de los estudiantes. Alteridad: Revista de Educación, 15(1), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.17163/alt.v15n1.2020.05
Martínez Pérez, S., Fernández Robles, B., & Barroso Osuna, J. (2021). La realidad aumentada como recurso para la formación en la educación superior. Campus Virtuales, 10(1), 9-19. https://ariasmontano.uhu.es/rest/api/core/bitstreams/1f654809-2f0b-4abc-857f-4952df9fb762/content
Organización de las Naciones Unidas. (2015). 17 Objetivos Para Transformar Nuestro Mundo: la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible (A/RES/70/1). https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/
Quintero, J., Baldiris, S., Rubira, R., Cerón, J., & Velez, G. (2019). Augmented reality in educational inclusion. A systematic review on the last decade. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, article 1835. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01835
Ruiz Torres, D. (2011). Realidad aumentada, educación y museos. Revista ICONO 14. Revista científica de Comunicación y Tecnologías emergentes, 9(2), 212-226. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v9i2.24
Sagástegui, D. (2004). Una apuesta por la cultura: el aprendizaje situado. Revista Electrónica Sinéctica, (24), 30-39. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/998/99815918005.pdf
Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3/4), 591-611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333709
Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 72-101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412159
Sırakaya, M., & Alsancak Sırakaya, D. (2022). Augmented reality in STEM education: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1556-1569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1722713
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1). United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jonathan Giovanni Soto Muñoz, Jesús Antonio Zuñiga Arce, Israel Durán Encinas, Jesús Andrés Sandoval Bringas, Samuel Montané Baños, Arturo Ivan de Casso Verdugo (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
